You can’t help but watch in amazement at the hyper growth of many recent consumer internet companies. And now, just as quickly, the speed at which some are plateauing, or even declining, is just as striking.
The theory folks are kicking around in tech circles is these companies are reaching market saturation faster than ever due to viral channels (read: facebook). Their growth then slows (or even reverses). Net: they’re moving through the typical lifecycle of a business at an accelerated rate
(Thanks to http://joshbersin.com/2008/07/31/make-learning-part-of-your-business-strategy/ for the graphic!)
The x-axis is now super compressed. Time is flying by. These folks end up in the decline and the subsequent fork in the road – rebirth or death – extraordinarily fast.
This poses an interesting new challenge: navigating the Innovator’s Dilemma at an accelerated rate.
For a company to achieve rebirth, it often has to invent a new line of business. This process is hard – the definitive book on the topic is Clayton Christensen’s Innovator’s Dilemma.
For the company to achieve rebirth, it often has to wrap its collective noggin around a new, small team, breaking the established rules, that may be doing things that cannibalize the existing business. An internal startup. This is so difficult to accept that the company often has to come near death to get sufficient internal support to really make a run at the new new thing. See Apple, IBM, etc.
So now back to our new world of accelerated timelines. Imagine running a business that goes from nothing to billions in a few short years. Your (still messy) systems are built around hyper growth – your culture, staffing, data dashboards you look at daily. Your employees’ expectations. And then, suddenly, you’re plateauing. You’re likely to not recognize it until a couple of months after it takes hold. And before you know it, you’re potentially in decline. It all happened so fast that your company is still tooled for hyper growth. Rebirth v death depends on how well you navigate the Innovator’s Dilemma.
We’re all watching this show in real time. It’s possible that these companies have an advantage in navigating the Innovator’s Dilemma – they’re already tooled for growth! On the other hand, their growth resources are fixated on a business that has saturated its market and now likely needs to be managed in a different way. How well these companies capture the energy around their now mature business into new forms of innovation – and how flexible the people, from senior leadership to individual contributors, are able to be, will likely determine the outcome.
Reblogged this on strutdogg and commented:
interesting
Interesting essay. You should submit it for publication on other blogs that have much broader circulation. I think it would educate a lot of folks who are currently ignorant of the “life cycle” concept, even without the timeline compression issue being considered.
Your post caught my eye on the Freshly Pressed page – I just happen to be reading “How Will You Measure Your Life?” by Christensen! Small world. Nice short and concise post.
Hey, I think this rebirth stuff can even be applied to religion (my interest). Thanks.
Interesting post. A big dilemma for the innovator is clearly finding the ability to execute on ideas within this accelerated timeline. It’s not just about the quality of the idea but focussing on managing growth and expectations. http://palumbopicks.wordpress.com
Interesting blog. I remember a story about Bill Hewlett when he was at HP. Bill was legend for short precise (what I will call) “quantum motivation.” He didn’t ratchet things up like, “Let’s do ten percent better next year,” he went big. For example, when the HP engineers had just innovated a calculator the size of a shoe box (the previous one being the size of a grocery box), instead of heaping accolades, Bill addressed the meeting with, “Now I want one that will fit in a shirt pocket” and abruptly left the stage. Consternation was quickly met with applause and knowledge that someone had the faith in them. The result was a mindset of, “Sure, we can do that!” and of course, they did.
It is remarkable hearing about the many companies that rise, get everyone excited, and then fizzle. If they’re lucky, a large corporation will pay an exorbitant price before they die. It’s a vicious cycle, and unsustainable. But, I also think we’re still in stages of adapting to an internet-based economy. We’re far more advanced than the late nineties, but there are still unknown business models to explore.
Reblogged this on Blog-a-tastic and commented:
Lifecycle of a business is like an lifecycle of our own life. There are up’s and down’s throughout life. It’s all a rollercoaster
Lifecycle of a business is like an lifecycle of our own life. There are up’s and down’s throughout life. It’s all a rollercoaster
Indeed, modern internet business seem to soar and plummet over night.
I think it is not just the quick market saturation (the plateau) that is the downfall of these companies. The consumer’s attention span has also shortened considerably. It is becoming increasingly harder to retain the consumer as they move on to the next big thing, which makes the decline fast and cruel.
Innovation. It’s a risk, but it’s definitely worth taking. Especially when no innovation at all, can lead to inevitable defeat.
Employing Sinek’s Golden Circle, the graph would reflect the execution of the “what’s” and “how’s”; however, if, for a company, the leaders also believe the graph captures its “why”, then either the company’s “why” was improperly defined or the market has shifted or no longer exists. The bottom line is to get the “why” nailed down so that the culture is always in a mode of driving continual “rebirth” of the “what’s” and “how’s”. It’s back to Lt. Colonel John Boyd’s Decision Cycle (or OODA Loop). My 2 cents…
ので 、無動作しているこれの管理者が質問 迅速内容|、その機能品質に、 、それは次のようになります。
マザーズバッグにも最適 完売これで最後 http://binatoneglobal.com
あなたがしている本当に 役立つ サイト; ことができませんでした屋ずにそれを作ります!
2015年春夏新作 即日出荷 http://www.kalkaeducationalsociety.com
紛れもなく あなたがすることを考えています。お気に入りの正当化 | ネット 最も簡単を意識する事で、であるように思われたがようでした。人々は検討ながら| イライライライラする | しないについて知っている、彼らはただはっきりことを心配取得|私は確かに間違いなく、あなたに言います。 できたことができます信号を取る人々は、あなたがトップ時に釘を打つことをどうにかもせずに全部外に定義副作用副作用が。 おそらくになります多くを得るために戻って。感謝
本物保証 激安販売 即日出荷 http://nightraft.com
あり、あなたが持っている仕事| 素晴らしい 行っ行わ。 私がよ 確かこれをDiggや私の部分について |私の友人にお勧めしますを示唆しています。 私は わから 彼らがよこのの恩恵を受けたこと。
レイバン国内正規品販売認定店 即日出荷 http://terracotta.com.ua
注意してください …私の心| 近くに近くに それはだことがあるこれは話題です! 場所を正確にあなたの連絡先の詳細はしかしありますか?
2015年春夏 完売これで最後 http://ophirpalmon.com
エクセレントビート! 私は I したい、あなたの改正ながら見習い方法 Webサイトサイトは、ウェブサイト、ウェブログ ウェブサイト?アカウントの取引|私は 助け助け。 I されているこのブロードキャストの| |ビット知り合いに精通して 少し小さな 提供 鮮やかな 明確な アイデア
即日出荷 バーゲンsale http://www.basienka.com.pl
ただ したい欲望あなたの記事のようにあると言う驚異。 | 単にあなたのポストで鮮明透明性がある と私は可能性 |この主題の専門家あなたがしているあなたがあると仮定します。 ファイン今後のポストに| 更新日まで保つために| | フィードRSSフィード私はあなたをつかむためにあなたの許可を持つましょう許可。おかげで百万と追いつくに運ぶ 報酬仕事。
最短翌日お届け セール対象商品 http://reflexology.ie
That’s a smart way of looinkg at the world.
I’m grateful you made the post. It’s cleared the air for me.
[…] Innovator’s Dilemma on an Accelerated Timeline « Seth’s Blog […]